I'm massively dissapointed - Total War: Warhammer (2024)

No Arbaal.

Boring Skulltaker as DLC.

Gorbad for the GS.

No actual Roadmap just marketing speech.

I really expected more from this. Well I hope we can still purchase each DLC part on its own because I only care about Golgfa*g here. Such a let down after the masterpiece that was ToD.

They mentioned there is another Khorne LL.

​

Captain_Rex#1635 wrote:

No Arbaal.

Boring Skulltaker as DLC.

Gorbad for the GS.

No actual Roadmap just marketing speech.

I really expected more from this. Well I hope we can still purchase each DLC part on its own because I only care about Golgfa*g here. Such a let down after the masterpiece that was ToD.

Arbaal is almost certainly the FLC lord they said there is another Khorne character and that they are doubling down on Khorne. Don't go throwing a tantrum just yet.

​

kaiki#4128 wrote:
They mentioned there is another Khorne LL.

Which should be Skulltaker. As an FLC. Making such a boring character the DLC is tone deaf and just stupid. Arbaal is the one that deserves DLC treatment.

​

Captain_Rex#1635 wrote:

No Arbaal.

Boring Skulltaker as DLC.

Gorbad for the GS.

No actual Roadmap just marketing speech.

I really expected more from this. Well I hope we can still purchase each DLC part on its own because I only care about Golgfa*g here. Such a let down after the masterpiece that was ToD.

Arbaal will be the FLC.

Abit weird.... but Epidemius got given good mechanics so it doesn't make much difference. If anything it means I might actually bother to play Skulltaker.

​

afverrall#1754 wrote:

​

Captain_Rex#1635 wrote:

No Arbaal.

Boring Skulltaker as DLC.

Gorbad for the GS.

No actual Roadmap just marketing speech.

I really expected more from this. Well I hope we can still purchase each DLC part on its own because I only care about Golgfa*g here. Such a let down after the masterpiece that was ToD.

Arbaal is almost certainly the FLC lord they said there is another Khorne character and that they are doubling down on Khorne. Don't go throwing a tantrum just yet.

Arbaal should be the DLC not boring Skulltaker who is the definition of FLC material.

What I reacted to the most that the Khorne DLC will be at the end of the year. Okay...

If it takes 6 months to create a ToD-level DLC, even with some random FLCs inbetween, is it even worth to keep, rather than a WH2 1v1 every 4 months or so?

The FLC LL is confirmed to be for Khorne so for all we know Arbaal is the FLC.

What's wrong with Gorbad? I would have preferred Snagla but Gorbad was one of the top contenders.

They literally told us that Slaanesh won't be forgotten, the DLC is coming late in the year, they are looking to rework Cults, Norsca and VC will get their day, Geomatic Web rework still in the plans, big reworks incoming outside of .0 patches so we don't have to wait that long, ToD format is going to be kept, IE is now the focus and repeatedly told us that there is still a lot of content to be added.

We don't exactly what we are getting next but we were given way more information that I or anyone expected.

I myself feel the opposite way. I find human Chaos lords very boring and repetitive. Daemons are at least interesting otherwordly creatures. I am pleased with Skulltaker, and the concept of him gaining power as he takes skulls from powerful enemies is very cool.

But do not worry, Arbaal is most certainly the FLC lord.

​

TheWattman#7460 wrote:

What I reacted to the most that the Khorne DLC will be at the end of the year. Okay...

If it takes 6 months to create a ToD-level DLC, even with some random FLCs inbetween, is it even worth to keep, rather than a WH2 1v1 every 4 months or so?

TWW2 1v1 DLCs also often took 5 or 6 months to make.

​

TheWattman#7460 wrote:

What I reacted to the most that the Khorne DLC will be at the end of the year. Okay...

If it takes 6 months to create a ToD-level DLC, even with some random FLCs inbetween, is it even worth to keep, rather than a WH2 1v1 every 4 months or so?

They hinted that there would be bigger patches in the meantime - which with 5.1 we just saw alot of work on the MP. There's a fair chance we might get a race rework before 6.0.

​

mecanojavi99#6562 wrote:

The FLC LL is confirmed to be for Khorne so for all we know Arbaal is the FLC.

What's wrong with Gorbad? I would have preferred Snagla but Gorbad was one of the top contenders.

They literally told us that Slaanesh won't be forgotten, the DLC is coming late in the year, they are looking to rework Cults, Norsca and VC will get their day, Geomatic Web rework still in the plans, big reworks incoming outside of .0 patches so we don't have to wait that long, ToD format is going to be kept, IE is now the focus and repeatedly told us that there is still a lot of content to be added.

We don't exactly what we are getting next but we were given way more information that I or anyone expected.

Tahts the problem. Arbaal should be DLC.

Everything is wrong with Gorbad. he is dead for a milleniaand just a boring version of Grimgor. We all knew that Slaanesh would get a DLC. I was hoping for an actual Roadmap with infos about the races.

​

Serkelet#1834 wrote:

I myself feel the opposite way. I find human Chaos lords very boring and repetitive. Daemons are at least interesting otherwordly creatures. I am pleased with Skulltaker, and the concept of him gaining power as he takes skulls from powerful enemies is very cool.

But do not worry, Arbaal is most certainly the FLC lord.

I'm the exact opposite. I couldn't care less about Daemons and only care about mortals. Skulltaker as DLC is just mind boggling.

​

Yurisusuki#3719 wrote:

Anyone was expecting other than Ironclaw?That's a surprise for me..

Most people expected Gorfang or Snagla which would be 1000 times better than Gorbad.

​

mecanojavi99#6562 wrote:

The FLC LL is confirmed to be for Khorne so for all we know Arbaal is the FLC.

What's wrong with Gorbad? I would have preferred Snagla but Gorbad was one of the top contenders.

They literally told us that Slaanesh won't be forgotten, the DLC is coming late in the year, they are looking to rework Cults, Norsca and VC will get their day, Geomatic Web rework still in the plans, big reworks incoming outside of .0 patches so we don't have to wait that long, ToD format is going to be kept, IE is now the focus and repeatedly told us that there is still a lot of content to be added.

We don't exactly what we are getting next but we were given way more information that I or anyone expected.

This is all wonderful news. Can’t imagine really being disappointed with this.

Captain_Rex#1635 wrote:
Arbaal should be the DLC not boring Skulltaker who is the definition of FLC material.

What’s the difference? They’re both LLs that seek challenges. As long as they have good models it works out to be the same.

​

TheWattman#7460 wrote:
If it takes 6 months to create a ToD-level DLC, even with some random FLCs inbetween, is it even worth to keep, rather than a WH2 1v1 every 4 months or so?

If it works out to be the same difference in content, it doesn’t matter too much. We do get higher quality units out of the deal compared to WH2.